Could Jamie Lynn Spears Have An Abortion?
Probably the oddest thing about the entire Jamie Lynn Spears pregnancy is the fact that abortion apparently hasn’t even been discussed as an option. This could make sense if a Nickelodean exec really is the father since Jamie Lynn and the family might be a little pissed, but it definitely seems like this is the kind of thing that you’d expect to have taken care of in a hush hush manner, possibly with a payout or something to Jamie Lynn.
Since most miscarriages occur in the first or early second trimester, and Jamie Lynn is already 3-4 months along, my guess is that if Jamie Lynn ends up “losing” the baby we’ll be seeing a situation where she decided she couldn’t go through with things and decided to terminate.
But then again, you have to think she’s already done significant damage to her career by getting knocked up at such a young age. Jamie Lynn Spears’ biggest hurdle in life was likely to be proving that she wasn’t as big of a headcase as her sister, and she’s pretty much blown that already. Which really makes you wonder why this wasn’t swept under the rug to begin without any media coverage.
Really a strange situation all around, one that I think still has a few twists and turns left to see.
your a sick fuck..go kill yourself
To comment #1, you are out of your mind. Speak only for yourself. First, abortion is legal and a woman’s choice, as it should be for women to have any hope of controlling their lives and futures. Second, children should not be having children. It is a backwards reactionary anti-woman point of view to suggest that every fertilized egg, every pregnancy has to be brought to term. That is oppression of women, and in this case, a young girl.
If you think children are too young to have children, then what makes you think children are old enough to destroy their children in abortion? That psychological fallout is difficult enough for grown women to navigate much less children. If you think a young girl is mature enough to make such a choice, then surely she is mature enough to carry a baby to term. Mature enough even to raise a child.
I have a good friend whose mother had her at 14. She married a man who has a daughter who lost her mother when she was around 10 years of age. Where would this family be without the new mom who was born of a 14-year-old? OK, so the 14-year-old got pregnant, she had a baby, they are both doing very well in life. There was a purpose for my friend and a purpose for everyone. The 14-year-old’s grandmother helped her raise the baby; she didn’t, like others, try to coerce her into an unwanted abortion. The grandmother did not oppress her granddaughter; she helped her. She supported her right to have her baby.
Not everyone has this support because everyone is running around saying women can’t be equal without killing their children. Our society is being taught that when adversity rears its head, we trash people to bail ourselves (or our boyfriends) out. People now think abortion is the answer, and so that is what they support: the easy way out–easy for WHO??? Those advocating it? Certainly not for the woman who lays her body (and her child’s) down and would otherwise not be there if she had support enough to carry on in a positive way.
BTW, you and I have different ideas about what oppression really is.
Oppression of women is viewing them as nothing more than hosts to “parasites” to be threatened and coerced into abortion as you suggest left and right in your post. Oppression of women is telling them that they are so weak that they have to choose between their children and their future. Oppression of women is abandoning them to abortion as if that is the only thing that will solve their problems. Oppression of women is not being there for them when they suffer physically and/or emotionally after abortion. Oppression of women is caring more about protecting abortion than protecting women.
Suzan, I could be wrong, but you sound like a woman who has never aborted a child. I on the other hand have. It is not what you are promoting it to be. It is NOT the answer.
Okay. Obviously, people get very easily heated over celebrities’ lives. Anyway, Abortion is a choice that every woman is entitled to consider. No one can be foreced to abort their child, and no one can be forced to keep it. It is up to the mother; not their parents, not their managers, not a commentor on a website. I applaud that Spears has decoded to take responsibility for her actions to keep the child, but at the same time, with all of the negative energy, it may not be a bad idea to abort. Just an option.
shes only 16????
no i dont think she should have one because its not right and i know jamie will be a great mother and take care of that baby well all i can say she is better than anyone and may make mistake but we all do